People Flowing Through the System – Lean Principle #3 in the PDS

Within this people-centered system, time is obviously important, as is movement. Although, the time element of flow in the people development system is different. Takt time, cycle time, and touch time don’t necessarily apply in the same ways. Those of us who have spent significant time in manufacturing might struggle with this concept because time applies constant pressure to a manufacturing process. For this system though, the work that flows through the system is the work of developing people.

Lean Principle 3 – Create flow.

The traditional definition of flow in lean means that a product moves without interruption from one production station to the next. When each production step is completed, the part can simply move on to the next station and begin being processed.

When it comes to developing people it’s not simply moving from one station to another, or one department to another, but also from one level of knowledge, capability, and competence.

The critical consideration here is that some level of advancement, flow, is being made often and with intentionality so that the people being served by the system are making continual progress on their development journey.

In production, value is added when something is done to the product as it flows through the system, which moves it closer to what the customer has asked for. In the PDS, value is added when the people served by the system grow and develop and move closer to what all of the PDS customers have asked for (the four customers described in the post on the first lean principle).

How can you tell if the PDS is creating flow?

The best way to know if people are progressing at a proper pace is to know where they are supposed to be going. Development pathways are excellent tools that track an employee’s progress along their personalized development journey. A learning management system can also help, but a pathway or individual development plan adds an element of planning that might be more visible than what is available in an LMS.

There are also key data points that help to identify flow patterns. Data that shows how many people are actively engaged in development activities; the number of people being cross-trained; how many people have been promoted through the system; new capabilities gained, and performance management successes. Just to name a few.

Tracking flow helps PDS leaders identify how people are progressing and which positions/disciplines are moving through the system by connecting key metrics from training to retention and performance management.

Where flow comes from in the PDS

Create flow in the PDS by ensuring that everyone is progressing along their development path, career ladder, etc. Flow increases when the PDS and its stakeholders are constantly looking for and developing key attributes and talent. In addition, flow is enhanced when departments and teams are growing in ability, capacity, and productivity, moving people into greater roles, more responsibilities, and increased levels of knowledge.

If you can’t create flow, establish pull, which is the lean principle we’ll look at in the next post.

Comments

3 responses to “People Flowing Through the System – Lean Principle #3 in the PDS”

  1. orderthought Avatar
    orderthought

    Good morning, Just read your latest piece on flow. You mention the struggle that folk deep in manufacturing have with the time element in the PDS. I wonder if part of that problem is that the PDS is more of a dynamic process than typical manufacturing processes. Here I’m using a definition of “dynamic”: Characterized by continuous change, activity, or progress. I believe manufacturing process are characterized by continuous activity and progress but perhaps not by change as is PDS. Change has a significant influence/impact on time and vice versa.

    I’m not suggesting that PDS is a dynamic system in the mathematical sense!!! And not trying to complicate things. Just a thought that hit me as I was reading.

    Peace friend,

    Art

    >

    Like

    1. Tim Waldo Avatar

      Hey my friend. You are correct, the PDS is a very dynamic system as you have defined it, and it moves at a different pace as compared to a production system. Change in this people system happens more slowly in comparison and it might suffer from a lack of any sense of urgency. There can be a disconnect between stakeholders and certain customers (those people learning and growing from system activities) as to this missing sense of urgency. To optimize the PDS, stakeholders need to constantly consider the implications of time – how often they are engaging in development activities, how much time passes between growth activities, etc. Just making sure to pay attention to the various elements of time and managing expectations is a great step forward.

      Like

      1. orderthought Avatar
        orderthought

        With regard to the pace of change and the implications of time, PDS vs. production system, a key difference between the two may be the area of measurement. In most production systems there are things clearly identified as tolerances and variances that are tracked to announce or give some indication when a system may have a problem–“out of whack”. The PDS in most organizations have no such measurement. (I assume talent stream mapping will help fix this). Therefore, leaders, managers and supervisors MUST be so focused on state of talent that they sense issues before they surface. Better yet, those individuals MUST manage/lead in a way that ensures the readiness of talent! Sort of gets back to culture doesn’t it! Peace friend.

        >

        Like

Leave a reply to Tim Waldo Cancel reply